🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated the MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some individuals to follow this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, further nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this international conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.